2026 Midterms · Race Center
The House battlegrounds that decide the majority
District-level odds from Kalshi, Polymarket and PredictIt for the most competitive House seats, with the Precision Combined forecast for each.
For the national picture, see Control of Congress. District polls are rare and not yet in our feed, so House forecasts here use the three markets.
- 58% DCait Conley · 3 of 4 sources
NY-17Toss-up
Cait Conley (D) vs. Mike Lawler (R)
- Kalshi
- 59¢
- Poly
- 60%
- PredictIt
- 60¢
- Polls
- —
- 61% DWilliam Lawrence · 2 of 4 sources
MI-07Toss-up
William Lawrence (D) vs. Tom Barrett (R)
- Kalshi
- 62¢
- Poly
- 63%
- PredictIt
- 56¢
- Polls
- —
- 64% RPaul LePage · 2 of 4 sources
ME-02Toss-up
Paul LePage (R) vs. Matt Dunlap (D)
- Kalshi
- 64¢
- Poly
- —
- PredictIt
- 62¢
- Polls
- —
- Not enough data
CA-27Toss-up
Whitesides (D) vs. GOP nominee
- Kalshi
- 96¢
- Poly
- —
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 66% DDon Davis · 3 of 4 sources
NC-01Leaning
Don Davis (D) vs. Laurie Buckhout (R)
- Kalshi
- 65¢
- Poly
- 67%
- PredictIt
- 67¢
- Polls
- —
- 72% DRebecca Cooke · 2 of 4 sources
WI-03Leaning
Rebecca Cooke (D) vs. Derrick Van Orden (R)
- Kalshi
- 74¢
- Poly
- 74%
- PredictIt
- 89¢
- Polls
- —
- 73% DPaige Cognetti · 2 of 4 sources
PA-08Leaning
Paige Cognetti (D) vs. Rob Bresnahan (R)
- Kalshi
- 74¢
- Poly
- 73%
- PredictIt
- 0¢
- Polls
- —
- 74% DMarcy Kaptur · 2 of 4 sources
OH-09Leaning
Marcy Kaptur (D) vs. Derek Merrin (R)
- Kalshi
- 74¢
- Poly
- 74%
- PredictIt
- 45¢
- Polls
- —
- 78% DSarah Trone Garriott · 2 of 4 sources
IA-03Leaning
Sarah Trone Garriott (D) vs. Zach Nunn (R)
- Kalshi
- 81¢
- Poly
- 78%
- PredictIt
- 0¢
- Polls
- —
- 78% DAmish Shah · 2 of 4 sources
AZ-01Leaning
Amish Shah (D) vs. Jay Feely (R)
- Kalshi
- 78¢
- Poly
- 78%
- PredictIt
- 87¢
- Polls
- —
- 80% DJanelle Stelson · 2 of 4 sources
PA-10Leaning
Janelle Stelson (D) vs. Scott Perry (R)
- Kalshi
- 80¢
- Poly
- 81%
- PredictIt
- 71¢
- Polls
- —
- 83% DJoAnna Mendoza · 2 of 4 sources
AZ-06Leaning
JoAnna Mendoza (D) vs. Juan Ciscomani (R)
- Kalshi
- 83¢
- Poly
- 83%
- PredictIt
- 86¢
- Polls
- —
- 84% DChristina Bohannan · 3 of 4 sources
IA-01Leaning
Christina Bohannan (D) vs. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R)
- Kalshi
- 88¢
- Poly
- 88%
- PredictIt
- 90¢
- Polls
- —
- 85% DManny Rutinel · 2 of 4 sources
CO-08Safe
Manny Rutinel (D) vs. Gabe Evans (R)
- Kalshi
- 87¢
- Poly
- 85%
- PredictIt
- 84¢
- Polls
- —
- 87% DElaine Luria · 2 of 4 sources
VA-02Safe
Elaine Luria (D) vs. Jen Kiggans (R)
- Kalshi
- 88¢
- Poly
- 87%
- PredictIt
- 40¢
- Polls
- —
- 87% DBob Brooks · 2 of 4 sources
PA-07Safe
Bob Brooks (D) vs. Ryan Mackenzie (R)
- Kalshi
- 87¢
- Poly
- 86%
- PredictIt
- 79¢
- Polls
- —
- 90% DMarie Gluesenkamp Perez · 2 of 4 sources
WA-03Safe
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D) vs. John Braun (R)
- Kalshi
- 91¢
- Poly
- 90%
- PredictIt
- 92¢
- Polls
- —
- 95% DDenise Powell · 3 of 4 sources
NE-02Safe
Denise Powell (D) vs. Brinker Harding (R)
- Kalshi
- 94¢
- Poly
- 95%
- PredictIt
- 94¢
- Polls
- —
- 96% DKristen McDonald Rivet · 1 of 4 sources
MI-08Safe
Kristen McDonald Rivet (D) vs. Thomas Smith (R)
- Kalshi
- 96¢
- Poly
- 95%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 96% DAdam Gray · 2 of 4 sources
CA-13Safe
Adam Gray (D) vs. Kevin Lincoln (R)
- Kalshi
- 96¢
- Poly
- 96%
- PredictIt
- 0¢
- Polls
- —
- 99% DEmilia Sykes · 1 of 4 sources
OH-13Safe
Emilia Sykes (D) vs. Carey Coleman (R)
- Kalshi
- 97¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 99% DJosh Riley · 1 of 4 sources
NY-19Safe
Josh Riley (D) vs. Peter Oberacker (R)
- Kalshi
- 97¢
- Poly
- 98%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
¢ = last trade price (1¢ ≈ 1% chance)% = Polymarket implied probability▲▼ = change since previous dayRCP links out; its averages aren’t licensed for republishing
Data as of Oct 13, 6:02 AM ET · refreshes about every 30 minutes · tap any race for the full comparison
How the Precision Funnel™ builds the Precision Combined number
Everything available on a race goes into the top of the funnel. No source has a fixed percentage: each one’s weight comes from how much evidence it carries for this race, by the published rule on the right.
- Public polls. Every public poll of the race, national, state or local, is vetted before it counts: how many people it reached, how recent it is, whether it screened for likely voters, and whether a party or campaign paid for it. Campaign internal polls are left out.
- Prediction markets, priced by money at risk. For each market we add up the dollars traded (contracts times price). A market with under $10k traded, a spread wider than 10¢, or a 15-point jump on under $25k is left out, because one buyer can set that price.
- Local and regional sources. Newspaper, radio and university polls get the same vetting as step 1. Today they arrive through the public poll feed; we are adding the local sources national feeds miss. In races national pollsters skip, such as state cabinet offices, they may be most of what exists.
- Attention and momentum. News volume and tone (GDELT) and Wikipedia pageviews for the two leading candidates, this week against the three weeks before. Attention is not votes, so it counts only through a gate: two independent sources with enough volume, all moving the same way. Then it carries 5% to 15% of the number; otherwise 0%, shown beside the number. Search interest and social platforms join as they are wired.
- our own member poll. Our panel, weighted to the voter file on party, age, sex, education, income and region. It starts with the same trust as outside polls and earns more only through a scored track record.Not live yet
- The number. Market prices are scaled to add to 100%, a poll lead becomes a win chance with a bell curve 6 points wide, and the sources are averaged with their weights. Every race page prints the weights it got and why.
Full methodology →Why blend? Read the research →How we’ll be scored →
The weighting rule
Weight = trust × evidence, then scaled so the sources used add to 100%.
| Source | Trust | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi, Polymarket | 1 | Dollars traded ÷ (dollars traded + $50k). $50k counts half, $1M about 95%. |
| PredictIt | ½ | Fixed at ½, since PredictIt publishes no volume and caps each contract at $850. |
| Public polls | 1 | Grows with each vetted poll: full credit at 600 respondents, half credit every 21 days of age, less for registered voters or all adults, half for a partisan sponsor. |
| Precision member poll | 1 | Effective sample ÷ 800 (max 1) × share of demographic groups that match the voter file. Left out under 200 respondents. |
So a Senate race with deep markets and many polls lands near an even split, while a race no market lists and only one local paper polled leans almost entirely on the polls that exist. The constants above are the same for every race; changing one is a new method version, dated and logged. Trust values will be refit on our own scored history and the change published. RealClearPolitics is linked for comparison but not used: RCP has no public data feed and its terms don’t allow republishing its averages. Market prices reflect traders’ money, not a poll of voters. PredictIt data is shown under its non-commercial license. The Funnel never uses a number we did not measure or a source we cannot name.