2026 Midterms · Race Center
All 36 governor races, compared across markets and polls
Live odds from Kalshi, Polymarket and PredictIt next to the public polling average in every state electing a governor, with the Precision Combined forecast.
Projected governorships after Nov. 3
Democrats 25.7 of 50
14 seats not on the ballot, plus the Precision Combined chance in each of the 36 races, added up.
26 seats for a majority
- 51% DAaron Ford
NevadaToss-up
Aaron Ford (D) vs. Joe Lombardo (R)
- Kalshi
- 52¢
- Poly
- 55%
- PredictIt
- 51¢
- Polls
- R +1.0
- 55% RRick Jackson
GeorgiaToss-up
Rick Jackson (R) vs. Keisha Lance Bottoms (D)
- Kalshi
- 55¢
- Poly
- 53%
- PredictIt
- 51¢
- Polls
- R +1.6
- 66% RPhil Scott
VermontLeaning
Phil Scott (R) vs. Amanda Janoo (D)
- Kalshi
- 76¢
- Poly
- 75%
- PredictIt
- 83¢
- Polls
- D +6.0
- 71% DAmy Acton · 3 of 4 sources
OhioLeaning
Amy Acton (D) vs. Vivek Ramaswamy (R)
- Kalshi
- 69¢
- Poly
- 70%
- PredictIt
- 84¢
- Polls
- D +3.9
- 72% DTina Kotek · 3 of 4 sources
OregonLeaning
Tina Kotek (D) vs. Christine Drazan (R)
- Kalshi
- 75¢
- Poly
- 76%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- D +2.0
- 75% DAmy Klobuchar
MinnesotaLeaning
Amy Klobuchar (D) vs. Lisa Demuth (R)
- Kalshi
- 95¢
- Poly
- 96%
- PredictIt
- 93¢
- Polls
- R +6.0
- 76% RGreg Abbott
TexasLeaning
Greg Abbott (R) vs. Gina Hinojosa (D)
- Kalshi
- 82¢
- Poly
- 80%
- PredictIt
- 79¢
- Polls
- R +2.7
- 78% RByron Donalds
FloridaLeaning
Byron Donalds (R) vs. David Jolly (D)
- Kalshi
- 79¢
- Poly
- 79%
- PredictIt
- 80¢
- Polls
- R +4.7
- 79% RTy Masterson · 3 of 4 sources
KansasLeaning
Ty Masterson (R) vs. Cindy Holscher (D)
- Kalshi
- —
- Poly
- 75%
- PredictIt
- 80¢
- Polls
- R +5.4
- 79% DDavid Crowley
WisconsinLeaning
David Crowley (D) vs. Tom Tiffany (R)
- Kalshi
- 80¢
- Poly
- 81%
- PredictIt
- 79¢
- Polls
- D +4.0
- 87% DKatie Hobbs
ArizonaSafe
Katie Hobbs (D) vs. Andy Biggs (R)
- Kalshi
- 87¢
- Poly
- 89%
- PredictIt
- 85¢
- Polls
- D +6.0
- 89% DRob Sand
IowaSafe
Rob Sand (D) vs. Zach Lahn (R)
- Kalshi
- 88¢
- Poly
- 89%
- PredictIt
- 89¢
- Polls
- D +8.1
- 89% RAyotte · 1 of 4 sources
New HampshireSafe
Ayotte (R)
- Kalshi
- —
- Poly
- —
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- R +7.5
- 90% RJim Pillen · 2 of 4 sources
NebraskaSafe
Jim Pillen (R) vs. Lynne Walz (D)
- Kalshi
- 91¢
- Poly
- 90%
- PredictIt
- 97¢
- Polls
- —
- 92% DDeb Haaland
New MexicoSafe
Deb Haaland (D) vs. Gregg Hull (R)
- Kalshi
- 92¢
- Poly
- 91%
- PredictIt
- 96¢
- Polls
- D +17.0
- 92% DJocelyn Benson
MichiganSafe
Jocelyn Benson (D) vs. John James (R)
- Kalshi
- 93¢
- Poly
- 94%
- PredictIt
- 90¢
- Polls
- D +8.3
- 92% RTommy Tuberville
AlabamaSafe
Tommy Tuberville (R) vs. Doug Jones (D)
- Kalshi
- 93¢
- Poly
- 94%
- PredictIt
- 88¢
- Polls
- R +13.0
- 93% RMike Mazzei · 2 of 4 sources
OklahomaSafe
Mike Mazzei (R) vs. Cyndi Munson (D)
- Kalshi
- 93¢
- Poly
- 93%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 94% RMarsha Blackburn · 3 of 4 sources
TennesseeSafe
Marsha Blackburn (R) vs. Jerri Green (D)
- Kalshi
- 94¢
- Poly
- 94%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- R +11.0
- 94% RAlan Wilson · 3 of 4 sources
South CarolinaSafe
Alan Wilson (R) vs. Jermaine Johnson (D)
- Kalshi
- 94¢
- Poly
- 95%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- R +8.0
- 96% DXavier Becerra
CaliforniaSafe
Xavier Becerra (D) vs. Steve Hilton (R)
- Kalshi
- 96¢
- Poly
- 96%
- PredictIt
- 96¢
- Polls
- D +21.7
- 96% DHannah Pingree · 3 of 4 sources
MaineSafe
Hannah Pingree (D) vs. Robert Charles (R)
- Kalshi
- 95¢
- Poly
- 96%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- D +11.2
- 96% DKathy Hochul
New YorkSafe
Kathy Hochul (D) vs. Bruce Blakeman (R)
- Kalshi
- 95¢
- Poly
- 96%
- PredictIt
- 94¢
- Polls
- D +12.9
- 97% DPhil Weiser · 3 of 4 sources
ColoradoSafe
Phil Weiser (D) vs. Victor Marx (R)
- Kalshi
- 96¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- 97¢
- Polls
- —
- 97% DMaura Healey
MassachusettsSafe
Maura Healey (D) vs. Michael Minogue (R)
- Kalshi
- 95¢
- Poly
- 96%
- PredictIt
- 97¢
- Polls
- D +18.5
- 98% RBrad Little · 1 of 4 sources
IdahoSafe
Brad Little (R) vs. Terri Pickens (D)
- Kalshi
- 99¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 98% DNed Lamont · 3 of 4 sources
ConnecticutSafe
Ned Lamont (D) vs. Ryan Fazio (R)
- Kalshi
- 96¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- 97¢
- Polls
- D +17.0
- 98% DJB Pritzker · 3 of 4 sources
IllinoisSafe
JB Pritzker (D) vs. Darren Bailey (R)
- Kalshi
- 97¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- D +20.0
- 98%Kreiss-tomkins · 1 of 4 sources
AlaskaSafe
Open seat (Dunleavy term-limited)
- Kalshi
- —
- Poly
- —
- PredictIt
- 87¢
- Polls
- Kreiss-tomkins +12.0
- 98% RLarry Rhoden · 1 of 4 sources
South DakotaSafe
Larry Rhoden (R) vs. Dan Ahlers (D)
- Kalshi
- 97¢
- Poly
- 98%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 98% DHelena Foulkes
Rhode IslandSafe
Helena Foulkes (D) vs. Ken Block (I)
- Kalshi
- 97¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- 98¢
- Polls
- D +19.0
- 98% RSarah Huckabee Sanders · 1 of 4 sources
ArkansasSafe
Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) vs. Fredrick Love (D)
- Kalshi
- 98¢
- Poly
- 97%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 98% REric Barlow · 1 of 4 sources
WyomingSafe
Eric Barlow (R) vs. Kenneth Casner (D)
- Kalshi
- 97¢
- Poly
- 98%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
- 99% DJosh Shapiro
PennsylvaniaSafe
Josh Shapiro (D) vs. Stacy Garrity (R)
- Kalshi
- 99¢
- Poly
- 98%
- PredictIt
- 97¢
- Polls
- D +22.0
- 99% DWes Moore
MarylandSafe
Wes Moore (D) vs. Dan Cox (R)
- Kalshi
- 98¢
- Poly
- 98%
- PredictIt
- 98¢
- Polls
- D +27.0
- 99% DJosh Green · 1 of 4 sources
HawaiiSafe
Josh Green (D) vs. Gary Cordery (R)
- Kalshi
- 99¢
- Poly
- 99%
- PredictIt
- —
- Polls
- —
¢ = last trade price (1¢ ≈ 1% chance)% = Polymarket implied probability▲▼ = change since previous dayRCP links out; its averages aren’t licensed for republishing
Data as of Oct 13, 6:02 AM ET · refreshes about every 30 minutes · tap any race for the full comparison
How the Precision Funnel™ builds the Precision Combined number
Everything available on a race goes into the top of the funnel. No source has a fixed percentage: each one’s weight comes from how much evidence it carries for this race, by the published rule on the right.
- Public polls. Every public poll of the race, national, state or local, is vetted before it counts: how many people it reached, how recent it is, whether it screened for likely voters, and whether a party or campaign paid for it. Campaign internal polls are left out.
- Prediction markets, priced by money at risk. For each market we add up the dollars traded (contracts times price). A market with under $10k traded, a spread wider than 10¢, or a 15-point jump on under $25k is left out, because one buyer can set that price.
- Local and regional sources. Newspaper, radio and university polls get the same vetting as step 1. Today they arrive through the public poll feed; we are adding the local sources national feeds miss. In races national pollsters skip, such as state cabinet offices, they may be most of what exists.
- Attention and momentum. News volume and tone (GDELT) and Wikipedia pageviews for the two leading candidates, this week against the three weeks before. Attention is not votes, so it counts only through a gate: two independent sources with enough volume, all moving the same way. Then it carries 5% to 15% of the number; otherwise 0%, shown beside the number. Search interest and social platforms join as they are wired.
- our own member poll. Our panel, weighted to the voter file on party, age, sex, education, income and region. It starts with the same trust as outside polls and earns more only through a scored track record.Not live yet
- The number. Market prices are scaled to add to 100%, a poll lead becomes a win chance with a bell curve 6 points wide, and the sources are averaged with their weights. Every race page prints the weights it got and why.
Full methodology →Why blend? Read the research →How we’ll be scored →
The weighting rule
Weight = trust × evidence, then scaled so the sources used add to 100%.
| Source | Trust | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi, Polymarket | 1 | Dollars traded ÷ (dollars traded + $50k). $50k counts half, $1M about 95%. |
| PredictIt | ½ | Fixed at ½, since PredictIt publishes no volume and caps each contract at $850. |
| Public polls | 1 | Grows with each vetted poll: full credit at 600 respondents, half credit every 21 days of age, less for registered voters or all adults, half for a partisan sponsor. |
| Precision member poll | 1 | Effective sample ÷ 800 (max 1) × share of demographic groups that match the voter file. Left out under 200 respondents. |
So a Senate race with deep markets and many polls lands near an even split, while a race no market lists and only one local paper polled leans almost entirely on the polls that exist. The constants above are the same for every race; changing one is a new method version, dated and logged. Trust values will be refit on our own scored history and the change published. RealClearPolitics is linked for comparison but not used: RCP has no public data feed and its terms don’t allow republishing its averages. Market prices reflect traders’ money, not a poll of voters. PredictIt data is shown under its non-commercial license. The Funnel never uses a number we did not measure or a source we cannot name.